From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–22 of 22 articles for “reconstitution of title”

Reconstitution of Title Requires Strict Compliance and Proof of Existence

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on reconstitution of lost titles: strict compliance with RA 26 and proof of title existence required.

Reconstitution of Titles: Strict Compliance With Legal Requirements Is Mandatory

A Supreme Court ruling on title reconstitution underscores that strict compliance with RA 26's jurisdictional requirements is mandatory, or proceedings are void.

Reconstitution of Title Requires Authentic Decree, Not Mere LRA Certification

Supreme Court clarifies that reconstitution of lost titles needs authentic sources; a decree unavailable in LRA records cannot support it.

Pre-Trial Attendance Is Key: Consequences of Absenteeism in Philippine Courts

Philippine courts require strict compliance with pre-trial rules. Learn the consequences of absence and the rules on reconstitution of titles.

Reconstitution of Title: Strict Compliance with Notice Requirements for Jurisdiction

Philippine Supreme Court nullifies a title reconstitution for failure to notify the registered owners' heirs, stressing mandatory notice rules.

Reconstitution OF Title Jurisdiction Hinges ON Loss OR Destruction OF Original Certificate

Reconstitution of Title: Proving Loss of Owner's Duplicate Copy

Supreme Court clarifies evidence needed to reconstitute a lost certificate of title, emphasizing proof of loss over mere speculation.

Reconstitution of Title: The Critical Requirements of Loss and Good Faith

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies strict requirements for judicial reconstitution of lost or destroyed Torrens titles under RA 26.

Reconstitution of Titles: Strict Compliance and Jurisdictional Requirements in Land Registration

The Supreme Court clarifies that petitions for reconstitution of lost Torrens titles require strict compliance with jurisdictional requirements under RA 26.

Judicial Reconstitution of Title: Proving Loss of Prior Source Documents

Supreme Court clarifies evidence needed for judicial reconstitution of lost titles under RA 26, applying Bercede guidelines.

Reconstitution of Title in the Philippines: Strict Compliance and Proof of Ownership

Philippine Supreme Court explains strict requirements for judicial reconstitution of lost Torrens titles, including notice rules and proof of ownership.

Reconstitution of Title: Why Primary Evidence Matters in Land Registration

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on why reconstitution of a lost title requires primary evidence, not mere certifications.

Reconstitution of Title: Tax Declarations and Survey Plans Are Not Enough

Supreme Court rules tax declarations, survey plans, and technical descriptions are insufficient bases for reconstituting a lost or destroyed certificate of title.

Reconstitution of Title: When Insufficient Proof Blocks Restoration of a Lost Land Title

The Supreme Court denied a petition to reconstitute a lost Torrens title because the owner failed to prove a certificate of title was ever issued in the first place.

Reconstitution of Title: Strict Proof Required for Lost or Destroyed Land Titles in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies strict requirements for reconstitution of lost or destroyed land titles under RA 26, emphasizing proof of original title issuance.

Reconstitution of Titles: Limits on Register of Deeds Authority and Third Party Rights

When titles are reconstituted after fire, the Register of Deeds cannot annotate liens omitted from the new certificates without court order.

Reconstitution of Title: An Unsigned Duplicate Owner's Copy Is Not Enough

Philippine Supreme Court rules that an unsigned, unauthenticated owner's duplicate of a title cannot support judicial reconstitution under RA 26.

Reconstitution of Titles: Verifying Authenticity and Protecting Property Rights

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies judicial reconstitution of lost titles under RA 26, emphasizing owner's duplicate authenticity and jurisdictional requirements.

Reconstitution of Title: Proving Prior Issuance and the Value of Registry Records

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on reconstitution of lost titles, emphasizing proof of prior issuance and the importance of registry records under RA 26.

Reconstitution of Titles: Substantial Compliance and Jurisdictional Requirements

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on what jurisdictional requirements apply in judicial reconstitution of lost titles under RA 26.

Reconstitution of Title: Proving Ownership and Loss Under RA 26

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on what evidence is required to reconstitute a lost or destroyed certificate of title under Republic Act No. 26.

Upholding Property Rights: Reconveyance and Damages for Unlawful Possession

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on void reconstitution of title, laches, and property recovery explained in plain language.