Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Granting Extensions in Appeals: Balancing Justice and Procedural Rules in Philippine Courts
When can Philippine courts grant extensions to file appeals? The Supreme Court clarifies Rule 42 rules and the importance of substantial justice.
Wrong Appeal Mode in Agrarian Cases: When Procedural Lapses Prove Fatal
The Supreme Court clarifies that appeals from agrarian courts must use Rule 42 petitions, not ordinary appeals, or the decision becomes final.
Forcible Entry Appeals: Why Attaching the Right Pleadings Matters
Learn why the Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a forcible entry appeal for missing pleadings under Rule 42.
Upholding Procedural Rules: The Necessity of Complete Documentation in Appeals
The Supreme Court reminds litigants that appeals demand strict compliance with documentation rules under Rule 42.
Strict Rule 42 Compliance Required: The Magsino Case on Petition for Review Dismissals
Philippine Supreme Court affirms dismissal of petition for review for failure to attach required pleadings under Rule 42, clarifying rules on appeal.
Choosing the Right Appeal: Rule 41 vs. Rule 42 in Property Disputes
The Supreme Court clarifies when to use an ordinary appeal versus a petition for review in property cases, emphasizing the importance of the correct mode of appeal.
Balancing Technical Rules and Justice When the Court of Appeals Must Review Cases on Merit
The Supreme Court clarifies that failure to attach all pleadings to a Rule 42 petition should not automatically result in outright dismissal.
Strict Adherence to Appeal Deadlines: A Guide to Filing Extensions
Learn how Philippine courts treat motions for extension of appeal deadlines, and why strict compliance with Rule 42 matters.
Beyond Oversight: Honest Mistake in Verification and Adherence to Court Mandates
SC clarifies that honest mistakes in verification do not excuse failure to attach adverse lower court orders under Rule 42.
Rule 42 Dismissal: How Defective Verification and Annexes Can Kill an Appeal
A Supreme Court ruling on Rule 42 petitions shows how verification defects and missing certified copies can doom an appeal before the Court of Appeals.
Substantial Compliance With Rule 42 Requirements: The Navalta Case on Procedural Rules
The Supreme Court rules that substantial compliance with Rule 42 petition requirements can cure technical defects, favoring merits over procedure.
Certiorari Petitions: Substantial Compliance With Procedural Rules For Timely Review
SC rules substantial compliance with Rule 42 requirements may excuse dismissal of petitions for review, protecting the right to appeal.
Substantial Compliance Prevails When Technicalities Give Way to Justice in Appellate Procedure
SC rules substantial compliance with Rule 42 requirements suffices; cases should be decided on merits, not technicalities.
Procedural Deadlines Matter: Why Second Extension Motions Can Sink Your Appeal
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on why a second motion for extension to file an appeal can be fatal, and what litigants must know about Rule 42 deadlines.
Dismissal for Non-Compliance: When Missing Documents Doom Your Appeal
Missing pleadings in a Rule 42 petition can get your appeal dismissed. Learn the mandatory attachment rules from Atillo v. Bombay.