Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 18 of 8 articles for self-incrimination

When Apology and Self-Incrimination Collide: Defining Willful Disobedience in Labor Disputes

The Supreme Court clarifies when an employee's refusal to apologize is not willful disobedience justifying dismissal under the Labor Code.

Legislative Inquiries vs Sub Judice: Balancing Congressional Power and Individual Rights

Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling in Romero v. Estrada on legislative inquiries, the sub judice rule, and witness rights.

Drug Testing and Constitutional Rights: The Supreme Court's Balancing Act in the Philippines

The Supreme Court upheld random drug testing for students and employees but struck down mandatory tests for candidates and accused persons.

DNA Evidence and Conviction: The Yatar Case and the Standard for Admissibility

Explaining how the Supreme Court in People v. Yatar set the standard for admitting DNA evidence in Philippine criminal cases.

Voluntary Confessions in Philippine Law: Safeguarding the Rights of the Accused

Understanding the constitutional safeguards governing voluntary confessions in Philippine criminal procedure, and how courts protect the accused.

Confessions to Media in Philippine Law: The Domantay Case on Custodial Investigation

When are confessions to media admissible in Philippine courts? The Domantay case explains the limits of custodial investigation rights.

Valid Confession in Philippine Law: When Your Words Can Be Used Against You

Learn when a confession is valid and admissible in Philippine courts, and how constitutional rights during custodial investigation protect accused persons.

Admissibility of Extrajudicial Confessions: Safeguarding Rights in Philippine Criminal Law

The Supreme Court clarifies the four requirements for admissible extrajudicial confessions and what makes counsel "competent and independent" in custodial investigations.