[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 49-2016, February 10, 2016 ]
[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 49-2016, February 10, 2016 ]
[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 49-2016, February 10, 2016 ]
TO : THE COURT OF APPEALS, SANDIGANBAYAN, COURT OF TAX APPEALS, REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS, SHARI'A DISTRICT COURTS, METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURTS, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS IN CITIES, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS, MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURTS, SHARI'A CIRCUIT COURTS, THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF STATE PROSECUTOR, PUBLIC ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES
SUBJECT : SUSPENSION FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW FOR SIX (6) MONTHS OF ATTY. RUDY T. ENRIQUEZ
For your information and guidance, quoted hereunder is the dispositive portion of the Decision of Second Division dated 16 September 2015 in Administrative Case Nos. 8319, 8329 and 8366, entitled "David Williams, et al. vs. Atty. Rudy T. Enriquez," to wit:
WHEREFORE, Atty. Rudy T. Enriquez is guilty of violating Canon 12 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and is SUSPENDED from the practice of law for a period of Six (6) Months. He is STERNLY WARNED that a repetition of the same or similar act will be dealt with more severely.
Atty. Enriquez is DIRECTED to inform the Court of the date of his receipt of this decision to determine the reckoning point of the effectivity of his suspension.
10 February 2016
(SGD.) JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ Court Administrator
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.