[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 22-2013, February 08, 2013 ]
[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 22-2013, February 08, 2013 ]
[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 22-2013, February 08, 2013 ]
TO : THE COURT OF APPEALS, SANDIGANBAYAN, COURT OF TAX APPEALS, REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS, SHARI'A DISTRICT COURTS, METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURTS, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS IN CITIES, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS, MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURTS, SHARI'A CIRCUIT COURTS, THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF STATE PROSECUTOR, PUE5LIC ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES
SUBJECT: SUSPENSION FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW FOR FOUR (4) YEARS OF ATTY. EDUARDO D. RESURRECCION
For your information and guidance, quoted hereunder is the dispositive portion of the Decision of the Court En Banc dated 14 August 2012, in Administrative Case No. 9074, entitled "Grace M. Anacta vs. Atty. Eduardo D. Resurreccion," to wit:
"WHEREFORE, respondent Atty. Eduardo D. Resurreccion is ordered SUSPENDED from the practice of law for four years. He is also DIRECTED to return to the complainant the amount of P42.000.0C within thirty (30) days from the promulgation of this Decision."
In a Resolution dated 11 September 2012, the Court further CONSIDERED as SERVED the Notice of Judgment with a copy of Decision dated 14 August 2012 tent to respondent Atty. Eduardo D. Resurreccion at his given address which was returned unserved with notation on the return of service "Returned: Refused to Accept; other reasons went abroad since 2009."
8 February 2013
(SGD.) JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ Court Administrator
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.