Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 2548 of 216 articles for damages

Intent to Gain in Theft Cases: Good Faith Ownership Claims Under Philippine Law

Philippine theft law requires intent to gain. Learn how a good faith belief in ownership can defeat criminal charges, citing Amarille v. People.

Property Dispute Jurisdiction: Assessed Value of the Contested Area, Not the Whole Lot

Philippine courts decide property dispute jurisdiction by the assessed value of the specific area in question, not the entire property. Learn the rule.

Foreclosure Publication Rule: Why Missing the Notice Voids the Sale

Failure to publish a foreclosure notice under Act No. 3135 is a jurisdictional defect that invalidates the sale, as Baclig v. Rural Bank of Cabugao shows.

When a MOA Becomes a Binding Contract: Lessons from a Property Sale Dispute

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when a Memorandum of Agreement becomes a binding contract of sale, and why parties cannot later disavow it.

Bank Liable for Moral Damages Over Mortgage Redemption Insurance Non-Disclosure

When a bank offers mortgage redemption insurance, it must disclose coverage limits. Learn from Land Bank v. Miranda why non-disclosure can lead to damages.

Bank Negligence in the Philippines: The BDO v. Seastres Case on Extraordinary Diligence

When banks fail to exercise extraordinary diligence, they can be held fully liable for unauthorized withdrawals, as the Supreme Court ruled in BDO v. Seastres.

Libel in the Philippines: When Posting a Complaint Becomes a Crime

The Supreme Court clarifies the elements of libel, including publication and malice, in a case involving posted criminal complaints.

OFW Illegal Dismissal: Philippine Labor Laws Protect Workers Abroad

Philippine labor laws protect OFWs from illegal dismissal, even abroad. Learn the rules on retrenchment, due process, and remedies.

Lascivious Conduct Under RA 7610: The Magno Case Explained

The Supreme Court clarifies when touching a minor's private parts is lascivious conduct under RA 7610, citing the Magno case.

Reconveyance for Void Contracts: Imprescriptible Actions Under Article 1410

When a land transfer rests on a void or inexistent contract, an action for reconveyance does not prescribe, protecting rightful owners.

Lascivious Conduct Under RA 7610: The Trocio Case on Child Abuse

The Supreme Court clarifies what constitutes lascivious conduct under RA 7610, holding a doctor liable for abusing a minor patient.

When Delay Defeats Title: Laches and Registered Land in Lorenzo v. Eustaquio

The Supreme Court ruled that laches can defeat registered land ownership, even when the original transfer was flawed. Learn the key rules.

Illegal Dismissal of Pregnant Employee: SPID Corp. v. Ballesteros Explained

The Supreme Court affirmed that dismissing a pregnant employee without substantial evidence is illegal, reinforcing due process in Philippine labor law.

Treachery in Murder Cases: Why a Heated Argument Can Downgrade the Crime to Homicide

The Supreme Court explains when a killing after a heated argument lacks treachery, reducing murder to homicide under Philippine law.

Constructive Dismissal and Contract Ambiguity: Lessons from Esico v. Alphaland

The Supreme Court's ruling in Esico v. Alphaland clarifies constructive dismissal claims and the consequences of ambiguous employment contracts.

Power Lines and Public Lands: Supreme Court Clarifies Easements and Just Compensation

The Supreme Court ruled that power lines fall under "similar works" in the Public Land Act, allowing easements on free patent lands with compensation rules.

Treachery in Robbery with Homicide: The Supreme Court’s Ruling in People v. Juada

The Supreme Court clarifies when treachery aggravates robbery with homicide and affirms conviction based on circumstantial evidence in People v. Juada.

Constructive Dismissal vs. Just Cause Termination: Key Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court clarifies that constructive dismissal and just cause termination are incompatible, reinforcing due process and security of tenure.

Theft vs. Estafa in the Philippines: Key Distinctions and the Horca Case

Theft and estafa differ in possession and deceit. The Horca ruling shows why the distinction matters and how acquittal can still leave civil liability.

Can Heirs Challenge a Sale of Conjugal Property Made Without Spousal Consent?

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when a sale of conjugal property without spousal consent is voidable, and who may challenge it.

Spousal Consent and Conjugal Property: When a Sale Without Permission Is Void

Learn when a spouse can sell conjugal property without consent in the Philippines, and why such sales are void under the Family Code.

Defective Vehicle Refund and Manufacturer Liability Under the Consumer Act

Supreme Court ruling clarifies consumer refund rights for defective vehicles and manufacturer liability under RA 7394, with administrative fines reinstated.

Spousal Liability for Debts in the Philippines: The Zapanta Case Explained

When can one spouse be held liable for the other's debts? The Supreme Court's ruling in Zapanta v. Rustan clarifies the rules on family property liability.

Failure to State vs. Lack of Cause of Action: Key Distinctions in Philippine Property Cases

Learn the crucial difference between failure to state a cause of action and lack of cause of action, as clarified by the Supreme Court in Roa v. Sy.