Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 124 of 35 articles for corporate officer

Acquitted Corporate Officer Not Civilly Liable for Bouncing Check: Supreme Court Ruling

Supreme Court clarifies that a corporate officer acquitted of BP 22 violations cannot be held civilly liable for the dishonored check's value.

When a Corporate Officer Escapes Civil Liability for a Bounced Check Under BP 22

The Supreme Court clarifies that an acquitted corporate officer cannot be held personally liable for a dishonored corporate check under BP 22.

Letter of Authority vs. Letter Notice: When a BIR Tax Assessment Is Void

The Supreme Court ruled that a BIR Letter Notice cannot substitute for a Letter of Authority—assessments without a valid LOA are void.

Tortious Interference vs. Intra-Corporate Dispute: Jurisdiction in Corporate Conflicts

The Supreme Court clarifies when a corporate conflict is a civil tort case or an intra-corporate dispute, and which court has jurisdiction.

Navigating Disability Benefits for Seafarers: The Supreme Court's Ruling on Medical Assessments and Compensati

The Supreme Court clarifies when a seafarer's illness is presumed work-related and why a company doctor's bare finding of non-work relation is not enough.

COA Disallowances and the Limits of Audit Power Over PAGCOR Funds

The Supreme Court clarifies that COA's audit jurisdiction over PAGCOR is limited to specific funds, not all corporate expenditures.

B.P. 22 and the Corporate Veil: When Corporate Officers Face Personal Liability

The Supreme Court pierces the corporate veil in B.P. 22 cases, holding officers personally liable for bouncing checks—but only with proper notice of dishonor.

Employment Status and Control Test in Illegal Dismissal Cases: A Guide

Explaining how Philippine courts determine employment status and jurisdiction in illegal dismissal cases, using the Loreche-Amit v. CDMC ruling.

Loss of Trust and Confidence as Just Cause: Balancing Employer Rights and Due Process in Termination Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies when loss of trust and confidence justifies dismissal, and when employers still owe employees procedural due process.

Corporate Representation: The Necessity of Board Resolutions in Legal Actions

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when corporate officers need board resolutions to file or defend legal actions, and the limits of derivative suits.

Due Process in Club Membership Suspensions: The Ching v. QCSC Ruling

When can a club suspend a member without a hearing? The Supreme Court clarifies due process rules in Ching v. Quezon City Sports Club.

Corporate Records Access: Stockholder Rights and Officer Duties After Dissolution

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that a stockholder's right to inspect corporate records survives corporate dissolution and continues during liquidation.

Breach of Contract and the Limits of Bank Manager Authority: Apparent Authority in Real Estate Transactions

When does a bank branch manager's promise bind the bank? The Supreme Court explains apparent authority in Games and Garments Developers, Inc. v. Allied Banking Corporation.

Agency and Authority: When a Deed Does Not Mean a Done Deal in Property Sales

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when a deed of sale is void without proper agency authority under the Civil Code.

When Is a General Manager Considered a Corporate Officer? Philippine Jurisprudence

Explore how Philippine law defines corporate officers, and when a general manager may be considered one, based on Supreme Court rulings.

When a Judge's Side Business Crosses the Line: Lessons from Luarca v. Molato

The Supreme Court clarifies when a judge's involvement in a spouse's business becomes an administrative offense, and what judges must avoid.

Bouncing Checks and Civil Liability: Why You Can't Sue Separately for a BP 22 Violation in the Philippines

Learn why a bounced check can lead to estafa prosecution, not just BP 22, and what this means for your civil remedies.

Sandiganbayan Jurisdiction: Private vs Public Corporations in the Philippines

When does the Sandiganbayan have jurisdiction over corporate officers? Learn from the Morales ruling on private vs public corporations.

Protecting Marital Assets When Corporate Debt Cannot Seize Family Property

Supreme Court ruling on when corporate debts cannot reach family property, and the proper remedy for third-party claims in labor execution.

When Cross Collateral Clauses Clash With Verbal Agreements: Understanding Mortgage Obligations

The Supreme Court clarifies that bank branch managers cannot verbally alter mortgage contracts containing cross-collateral or dragnet clauses.

When Is a Statement an Admission? Lessons from a Prawn Feed Dispute

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when a written statement counts as an admission and when corporate officers can be held personally liable.

Deposition Deadlines in Intra-Corporate Cases: Philippine Computer Solutions v. Hernandez

The Supreme Court clarifies the 15-day discovery period under the Interim Rules on Intra-Corporate Controversies and the rule on interlocutory orders.

When Farm Closures Trigger Separation Pay: Elcee Farms v. NLRC

The Supreme Court clarifies when a farm closure or lease triggers separation pay and when corporate officers can be held personally liable.

Ombudsman Jurisdiction Over GOCCs: The Original Charter Requirement

The Supreme Court limits Ombudsman jurisdiction over GOCCs to those with original charters, not corporations merely acquired by government.