From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–15 of 15 articles for “fencing”

Fencing Cases: When Possession of Stolen Goods Proves Knowledge and Intent

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies how possession of stolen vehicle parts can establish knowledge and intent to gain in fencing cases under PD 1612.

Understanding the Limits of Presumptions in Fencing Cases: A Guide to Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

How Philippine courts weigh presumptions and evidence in criminal cases, explained through a recent Supreme Court ruling on trafficking and child abuse.

Possession Is Prima Facie Evidence: Understanding Fencing Under Philippine Law

The Supreme Court explains how mere possession of stolen goods can convict a person of fencing under PD 1612, and clarifies the proper penalty.

Good Faith VS Fencing: When A Notarized Affidavit Protects Purchasers

The Supreme Court acquits a buyer of a Komatsu grader, ruling that a notarized affidavit of ownership can overcome the presumption of fencing under PD 1612.

The Fencing Law and the Presumption in Dealing With Stolen Goods

Understand the Anti-Fencing Law's presumption of guilt for possessing stolen goods, explained through a Philippine Supreme Court case.

Fencing Law, Inconsistent Testimony, and the Burden of Proof in Criminal Cases

The Supreme Court acquits a jeweler of fencing, stressing that inconsistent testimony and hearsay cannot prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Fencing Conviction Reversed: Proving Knowledge of Stolen Goods in Philippine Law

Supreme Court acquits jeweler of fencing, stressing the need for competent proof of value and knowledge that goods were stolen.

When Presence Implies Participation: Fencing Conviction Reversed for Lack of Proof

The Supreme Court acquits a jeweler of fencing stolen jewelry, ruling that inconsistent testimony and hearsay cannot prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Unwittingly Buying Stolen Goods Understanding Fencing LAW IN THE Philippines

Learn how Philippine law treats the crime of fencing, what makes a buyer liable for receiving stolen property, and the legal consequences involved.

Standing to Sue: When Can a Neighboring Landowner Challenge a Fencing Permit?

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies who may question a fencing permit, explaining why neighboring lot owners lacked legal standing to file a certiorari petition.

Fencing in the Philippines: Why Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Matters – Tan v. People Case Analysis

Fencing charges require proof beyond reasonable doubt of every element, including knowledge the goods were stolen. Tan v. People shows why.

Fencing Under P.D. 1612: Possession Alone Can Establish Guilt

Explaining the Supreme Court ruling that mere possession of stolen goods creates a presumption of fencing under P.D. 1612, and how to rebut it.

Anti-Fencing Law in the Philippines: Possession and Legal Presumptions

The Anti-Fencing Law criminalizes dealing in stolen goods. Mere possession creates a presumption of fencing. Learn how to protect yourself.

Fencing in the Philippines: Knowledge and Presumptions Under the Anti-Fencing Law

Explaining the elements of fencing under P.D. 1612, the presumption of knowledge from possession, and how receipts can rebut it.

Moral Turpitude and Fencing: Understanding Disqualification in Philippine Elections

Learn how a fencing conviction disqualifies candidates from local office under Philippine election law, explained in plain language.