From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–24 of 29 articles for “forfeiture of benefits”

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Court Clerk for Theft of Court Funds

Court personnel who steal from court collections face dismissal, forfeiture of benefits, and disqualification from public office.

Judicial Misconduct: When a Court Employee's Conviction for BP 22 Means Forfeiture of Benefits

The Supreme Court clarifies when a court employee's conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude, like BP 22 violations, leads to dismissal and forfeiture of retirement benefits.

Moral Turpitude and Public Service: The Consequences of Dishonored Checks

A court clerk's conviction for three counts of BP 22 violations leads to forfeiture of benefits and perpetual disqualification from government service.

Navigating the Consequences of Corruption: Administrative Liability in the Judiciary

A Court of Appeals employee's role in case-fixing leads to dismissal and forfeiture of benefits, clarifying administrative liability rules.

Understanding Contempt of Court and the Consequences of Repeated Legal Harassment in the Philippines

Learn how Philippine courts penalize grave misconduct by judicial employees, including dismissal and forfeiture of benefits, to protect the integrity of the justice system.

Death Does Not Erase Misconduct: Forfeiture of Judge's Benefits Affirmed

Supreme Court rules a judge's death does not dismiss administrative cases; forfeiture of benefits stands for grave misconduct.

Judicial Accountability: Forfeiture of Benefits for Gross Ignorance of the Law

Supreme Court rules on judicial accountability, imposing fines on a retired judge for gross misconduct and defiance of Court orders.

Gross Misconduct Dismissal for Rape of Minor Inside Hall of Justice Premises

Court personnel who commit rape inside the Hall of Justice face dismissal for gross misconduct, forfeiture of benefits, and perpetual disqualification.

Resignation Not a Shield: Grave Misconduct and Accountability in Public Service

Supreme Court rules resignation does not erase administrative liability for grave misconduct, imposing perpetual disqualification and forfeiture of benefits.

Accountability in the Judiciary: Forfeiture of Benefits for Neglect of Duty and Misconduct

The Supreme Court affirms that public officials forfeit retirement benefits when found guilty of neglect of duty and misconduct, reinforcing accountability standards.

Accountability in the Judiciary: Forfeiture of Benefits for Neglect and Misconduct

Explore the Supreme Court ruling on CESB vs. CSC regarding PAO positions, third-level eligibility, and jurisdictional boundaries in civil service.

Accountability in Public Service: Forfeiture of Benefits for Grave Misconduct

A sheriff's grave misconduct and dishonesty led to forfeiture of benefits and perpetual disqualification, underscoring accountability in public service.

Dishonesty in Public Service: Forfeiture of Benefits Despite Resignation

Supreme Court rules resignation does not erase administrative liability; cash clerk found guilty of serious dishonesty for exam impersonation faces forfeiture of benefits.

Dishonesty IN Public Service Forfeiture OF Benefits Despite Prior Dismissal

Upholding Court Integrity: Dismissal for Grave Misconduct in Record Tampering

A clerk of court who overcharged filing fees and issued fake receipts faces dismissal, forfeiture of benefits, and criminal prosecution.

Mandatory Medical Reporting FOR Seafarers Forfeiture OF Benefits FOR NON Compliance

Sheriffs Accountability Improper FEE Collection Leads TO Dismissal AND Forfeiture OF Benefits

Upholding Ethical Conduct: Dismissal and Forfeiture of Benefits for Grave Misconduct in the Judiciary

Explore the Supreme Court's ruling on judicial misconduct, emphasizing accountability, ethical standards, and the consequences of grave offenses in the judiciary.

Falsifying Time Records in Government: The Case of a Court Process Server Dismissed for Dishonesty

A Supreme Court ruling shows how falsified daily time records lead to dismissal for dishonesty, forfeiture of benefits, and disqualification from public office.

Judicial Accountability Forfeiture OF Benefits FOR Gross Ignorance OF THE LAW

Judicial Integrity: Misappropriation of Court Funds Leads to Dismissal and Restitution

Supreme Court dismisses two court clerks for misappropriating over P4 million in judiciary funds, ordering joint restitution and forfeiture of benefits.

Dereliction of Duty: Forfeiture of Benefits for Negligent Court Personnel

Learn how the Supreme Court penalizes court personnel for dereliction of duty, including forfeiture of benefits and dismissal from service.

Dishonesty in Public Service: Forfeiture of Benefits Despite Transfer to Another Agency

Court rules on gross misconduct, bribery, and forfeiture of benefits for court personnel who extort money from litigants.

Demanding Money for Court Documents Constitutes Grave Misconduct and Bribery

Court personnel who demand money from litigants face dismissal, forfeiture of benefits, and disqualification from public office under the new CCACOP.