From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–24 of 65 articles for “philippine judiciary”

Drug Use in the Philippine Judiciary: When Rehabilitation Trumps Dismissal

The Supreme Court suspends a court employee for one year instead of dismissing him, signaling a shift toward rehabilitation for drug use.

Understanding Judicial Efficiency: The Impact of Timely Case Decisions in the Philippine Judiciary

Explore the Supreme Court's ruling on a Palawan judge fined for gross inefficiency, highlighting the mandatory 90-day case decision rule.

Judicial Accountability: Upholding Standards of Conduct and Competence in the Philippine Judiciary

The Supreme Court approves payment for judges' Hague training, affirming accountability and proper procedure in judicial education.

Understanding Gross Neglect of Duty in the Philippine Judiciary: Lessons from a Landmark Case

A sheriff's dismissal for grave misconduct and a stenographer's suspension reveal the high ethical standards required of Philippine court personnel.

Absence Without Leave: Upholding Public Service Standards in the Philippine Judiciary

Court personnel who go AWOL face dropping from the rolls. Learn the rules and consequences from a 2019 Supreme Court ruling.

Judicial Misconduct and Loss of Retirement Benefits: Upholding Ethical Standards in the Philippine Judiciary

A judge who assaulted a neighbor lost all retirement benefits. The Supreme Court explains why judicial temperament matters.

Judicial Conduct: Moral Standards and Accountability in the Philippine Judiciary

The Supreme Court dismisses a judge for immorality and gross misconduct, reaffirming that judges must uphold the highest moral standards.

Punctuality and Honesty: Upholding Integrity in the Philippine Judiciary

A murder conviction upheld on eyewitness testimony, clarifying treachery, conspiracy, and damages in Philippine criminal law.

Court Employee Accountability: Certifying False Documents in the Philippine Judiciary

The Supreme Court holds court employees liable for grave misconduct and dishonesty for certifying spurious decisions, reinforcing public trust in the judiciary.

Solicitation by Court Personnel: Upholding Integrity in the Philippine Judiciary

Supreme Court rules on grave misconduct by court personnel who solicits money from litigants, reinforcing integrity standards in the judiciary.

Falsifying Time Records: A Breach of Public Trust in the Philippine Judiciary

Court interpreter suspended for falsifying daily time records to attend law school, a dishonesty case that underscores accountability in the judiciary.

Falsifying Time Records: A Breach of Public Trust in the Philippine Judiciary

Court interpreter suspended six months for falsifying daily time records to attend law school. The Supreme Court rules on dishonesty, due process, and public accountability.

Judicial Clemency: Balancing Mercy and Public Trust in the Philippine Judiciary

The Supreme Court denies a former judge's plea for judicial clemency, reaffirming that remorse and reformation must be proven, not merely claimed.

Accountability Endures: Fiscal Responsibility in the Philippine Judiciary Even Post Mortem

A lawyer who sexually harasses a client faces suspension. The Court clarifies accountability and professional conduct standards.

Neglect of Duty in Court Service: Balancing Efficiency and Integrity in the Philippine Judiciary

The Supreme Court clarifies the line between simple neglect of duty and dishonesty in court service, using a process server's case as a guide.

Grave Misconduct in the Philippine Judiciary: What Court Employees Should Know

A Supreme Court ruling explains why court employees face dismissal for grave misconduct, even if criminal charges are dismissed.

Clerks Of Court Upholding Integrity AND Accountability IN Philippine Judiciary Funds

The Supreme Court affirms that clerks of court are guardians of judiciary funds, holding them accountable for financial integrity and public trust.

Drug Use and Dismissal: Upholding Judicial Integrity in the Philippine Judiciary

Philippine Supreme Court dismisses court clerk for drug use and defiance of court orders, affirming strict standards for judiciary employees.

Workplace Misconduct Upholding Decorum IN THE Philippine Judiciary 2

Court employee fined for simple misconduct after verbal abuse and physical assault on a co-worker inside court premises.

Judicial Misconduct: The High Cost of Incorrigible Ignorance in the Philippine Judiciary

A judge's fourth gross ignorance conviction leads to dismissal. Learn the rules judges must follow and why persistence in error is fatal.

Judicial Overreach: Defining the Limits of Disciplinary Authority in the Philippine Judiciary

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that executive judges cannot unilaterally impose penalties on court personnel, reaffirming the Court's exclusive disciplinary power.

Habitual Absenteeism in the Philippine Judiciary: What the Supreme Court Says

Explore how the Supreme Court treats habitual absenteeism among judges and court personnel, and the disciplinary consequences under Philippine law.

Upholding Judicial Efficiency: Disciplinary Actions for Delayed Case Resolution in the Philippine Judiciary

The Supreme Court holds judges and clerks of court accountable for delayed case resolution, reinforcing the constitutional right to speedy disposition of cases.

Judicial Conduct Upholding Impartiality AND Dispelling Appearance OF Bias IN THE Philippine Judiciary