Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Due Process Prevails: Informations Clarity Protects Against Unfair Conviction
The Supreme Court rules that administrative liability requires a formal charge, protecting public employees from unfair conviction based on delay alone.
Reassignment Orders and Insubordination: What Public Employees Must Know
Public employees must comply with reassignment orders even while appeals are pending. The Supreme Court clarifies the limits of insubordination.
Ombudsman's Power to Dismiss for Dishonesty and Grave Misconduct
The Supreme Court affirms the Ombudsman's power to dismiss erring public employees, not merely recommend their removal, in a case involving unremitted customs collections.
Loose Talk, High Cost: Public Employees and the Bounds of Decency
The Supreme Court sanctioned a Sandiganbayan driver for vulgar remarks about a co-worker, confirming that off-duty speech can still breach public service rules.
Gambling in the Workplace: Defining Ethical Conduct for Public Servants
Philippine Supreme Court ruling clarifies when gambling during office hours becomes a dismissible offense for public employees and sets ethical standards.
Public Servants Must Pay Just Debts: A Lesson in Integrity in Philippine Public Office
Philippine Supreme Court ruling: public employees face reprimand for willful failure to pay just debts, upholding integrity in public service.
Security of Tenure vs Valid Reassignment: Protecting Public Employees From Constructive Dismissal
The Supreme Court clarifies when a demotion amounts to constructive dismissal and when an employee may be considered retired.
Disciplinary Action vs Social Justice: When Does a Company's Code Overshadow an Employee's Rights
Supreme Court ruling on when procedural lapses yield to substantial evidence in administrative disciplinary cases against public employees.