[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 217-2015, September 18, 2015 ]
[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 217-2015, September 18, 2015 ]
[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 217-2015, September 18, 2015 ]
TO : THE COURT OF APPEALS, THE SANDIGANBAYAN, THE COURT OF TAX APPEALS, THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS, THE SHARI'A DISTRICT COURTS, THE METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURTS, THE MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS IN CITIES, THE MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS, THE MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURTS, THE SHARI'A CIRCUIT COURTS, THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF STATE PROSECUTOR, THE PUBLIC ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES
SUBJECT : LIFTING OF SUSPENSION FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW FOR ONE (1) YEAR'OF ATTY. JUSTO J. PARAS
For your information and guidance, quoted hereunder is the Resolution of the First Division dated July 1, 2015 in Administrative Case No. 4947 (Rosa Yap Paras vs. Atty. Justo J. Paras), to wit:
Considering the affidavit of compliance dated March 25, 2015 (with enclosures) of respondent Atty. Justo J. Paras stating, among other matters, that he has served the suspension imposed upon him in the Resolution dated February 14, 2005, the Court resolves:
(1) to NOTE the aforesaid affidavit of compliance;
(2) to NOTE the complainant's comment/objections (with leave of court) to the said affidavit of compliance, and praying that respondent be sanctioned accordingly;
(3) to NOTE the respondent's supplemental submission for completion of affidavit of compliance (with prior leave of court) dated May 15, 2015;
(4) to NOTE the complainant's comment/objections (with enclosures) to the supplemental affidavit of compliance (with leave of court) dated May 17, 2015;
(5) to LIFT the order of suspension from the practice of law meted against respondent Atty. Justo J. Paras in the Resolutin dated February 14, 2005; and
(6) to ALLOW Atty. Justo J. Paras to RESUME his practice of law considering that he has already fully served his one-year suspension from the practice of law.
September 18 , 2015
(SGD.) JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ Court Administrator
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.