Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Security of Tenure, Constructive Dismissal, and Floating Status in Security Agencies
When a security guard's floating status exceeds six months, the law treats it as constructive dismissal. Learn the rules from this Supreme Court case.
Reasonable Doubt IN Drug Cases Proving THE BUY Bust Transaction Beyond Suspicion
When Can You Sue the Philippine Government? The ATO Case Explained
The Supreme Court explains when government agencies can be sued, distinguishing sovereign from proprietary functions in the Air Transportation Office case.
Rape With Homicide Establishing Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Through Circumstantial Evidence
Docket Fee Payment Safeguarding Appeals Through Procedural Flexibility
Learn how the Supreme Court protects appellate rights through flexible docket fee payment rules and the consequences of non-compliance.
Rape Conviction and Deadly Weapon: Credibility of Witness Testimony in Philippine Courts
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies circumstantial evidence and witness credibility in rape with homicide conviction, affirming guilty verdict.
Barangay Fund Dispute and the Hierarchy of Courts: Lessons from Mendoza v. Villas
A barangay fund dispute shows why direct appeals to the Supreme Court fail when lower courts remain available.
Breach of Contract and Bank Negligence: Protecting Clients' Rights
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on bank liability for negligence in terminating credit lines and dishonoring checks without proper notice.
When Can Government Agencies Be Sued? The ATO Case on Tax and Sovereign Immunity
Explaining when Philippine government agencies can be sued, using the Air Transportation Office case on property tax disputes.
Mootness Doctrine: Expiration of Public Office and Its Effect on Legal Standing
Explaining the mootness doctrine and how the expiration of a public office affects legal standing in Philippine jurisprudence.
Supreme Court Affirms Conviction in Incestuous Rape, Adjusts Damages
The High Court affirms a father's rape conviction, clarifies penalties under RA 8353, and adjusts civil, moral, and exemplary damages.
Burden of Proof in Illegal Dismissal Cases: Establishing the Fact of Dismissal First
In illegal dismissal cases, employees must first prove the fact of dismissal before the burden shifts to the employer. Exodus v. Biscocho explains this rule.
SALN Disclosure: Ombudsman’s Authority Not Limited by Internal Office Procedures
Supreme Court ruling on SALN review, Ombudsman independence, and the limits of Section 10 RA 6713.
Unwavering Witness: How Philippine Courts Value Eyewitness Testimony in Murder Cases
Philippine Supreme Court affirms murder conviction based on credible eyewitness testimony, explaining how courts weigh witness credibility against alibi defenses.
When a Rape Conviction Can Rest on the Victim's Sole Testimony
Philippine Supreme Court explains when a rape conviction can rest solely on the victim's credible testimony, and why alibi rarely prevails.
SALN Compliance: Ombudsman’s Authority and the Limits of Employer Review
The Supreme Court clarifies that heads of offices reviewing SALNs cannot bar the Ombudsman from investigating public officials for substantive defects.
Simulated Bidding and Falsification: Public Officials' Liability Under Philippine Law
Supreme Court ruling on public officials liable for falsified bidding documents and graft under R.A. 3019 in simulated procurement.
SALN Review by Head of Office Cannot Bar Ombudsman From Filing Charges
Supreme Court clarifies that a head of office's failure to review a subordinate's SALN does not stop the Ombudsman from prosecuting falsification cases.
Eyewitness Testimony and Conspiracy Affirming Guilt in Murder Cases
The Supreme Court affirms a murder conviction based on credible eyewitness testimony, conspiracy, and treachery, explaining key rules for criminal cases.
Substantial Compliance vs Strict Interpretation: Upholding Appeals in Liquidation Proceedings
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on substantial compliance in appeals, using a bank liquidation case to clarify procedural rules.
Deceptive Practices in Sales: When Employees Face Estafa Liability
Sales employees can face estafa liability for deceptive practices. The Supreme Court explains when soliciting clients despite knowledge of fraud constitutes misrepresentation.
Motion Denied Understanding Defective Notice OF Hearing IN Philippine Courts
Philippine courts demand proper notice of hearing in motions; defects can lead to denial. Learn the rules and practical tips.
Treachery and Conspiracy: When Presence Makes You an Accomplice, Not a Principal
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when a bystander at a murder scene becomes an accomplice rather than a conspirator, and how treachery is proven.
Retrenchment in the Philippines: Balancing Employer Prerogative and Employee Rights
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when retrenchment is valid, how waivers and quitclaims are tested, and what happens when the required DOLE notice is late.