Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
When Can a Judge Be Held Administratively Liable? Lessons from Roxas v. Judge Eugenio
The Supreme Court clarifies that judges are not administratively liable for every erroneous ruling, only for errors made with malice or bad faith.
Sheriffs' Duty to Submit Timely Execution Reports: Dignum v. Diamla
The Supreme Court reminds sheriffs that failure to file periodic execution reports is simple neglect of duty, even without bad faith.
Due Process in Employee Dismissal: Backwages Only for Bad Faith Termination
Learn when reinstated government employees can claim backwages, and why procedural rules on appeals must still be followed.
Undue Injury and Bad Faith: Key Elements in Philippine Anti-Graft Cases
Explaining the Bustillo v. Sandiganbayan ruling on mandatory suspension and the interpretation of fraud in anti-graft cases.
When Good Faith Fails: Financing Firm's Foreclosure Voided for Ignoring Occupants' Rights
A financing firm's foreclosure was voided for bad faith because it ignored occupants' notice of a prior unregistered sale. Learn the due diligence rule.
Constructive Dismissal and Bad Faith in Employee Transfers: The Ponce v. NLRC Case
Understand the Supreme Court's ruling on employee transfers, constructive dismissal, and bad faith in Ponce v. NLRC.
Mortgage in Bad Faith When Due Diligence Falls Short
A mortgagee who fails to verify the identity and authority of the mortgagor is not in good faith and loses protection under PD 1529.
Judicial Conduct: Upholding Impartiality and Temperance On and Off the Bench
An administrative complaint fails when a judge's challenged orders are judicial in nature and no bad faith is shown — the Supreme Court's 2005 ruling explained.
When Is a Judge Liable for Ignorance of the Law? Lessons from Barredo-Fuentes v. Albarracin
The Supreme Court clarifies that judges are not liable for mere legal errors absent bad faith, and warns against harassment suits.
Liability for Damages: Balancing Official Duty and Personal Bad Faith
A public officer's official acts can still trigger personal liability for damages when done in bad faith, as this Philippine Supreme Court case shows.
Credit Card Suspension and Moral Damages: When Breach of Contract Lacks Bad Faith
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when credit card suspension without notice does not entitle cardholder to moral damages absent bad faith.
Transfer of Employees Is a Valid Managerial Prerogative Unless Done in Bad Faith
The Supreme Court explains when an employee transfer amounts to constructive dismissal and when it is a valid exercise of management prerogative.
Judicial Ethics: Judges Must Avoid Influencing Cases Pending in Other Courts
A Supreme Court ruling reminds judges that trying to sway the outcome of a case pending in another court violates judicial ethics, even without malice or bad faith.
Bumping Passengers Airline Liability for Overbooking and Bad Faith
When airlines overbook and bump confirmed passengers, they face liability for damages. The Supreme Court explains the rules.
Sufficiency of Information: The Critical Element of Manifest Partiality, Bad Faith, or Gross Negligence in Gra
Learn how the Supreme Court ruled that an information under Section 3(e) of RA 3019 must allege manifest partiality, bad faith, or gross negligence.
GSIS Bad Faith When Foreclosure Exclusions Require Property Return
When a mortgagee forecloses more than owed, courts may order reconveyance. This case explains bad faith and prescription rules.
Judicial Discretion vs Delay: Balancing Justice and Efficiency in Philippine Courts
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when court delays warrant administrative liability, distinguishing error from bad faith in judicial discretion.
Public Official Liability and Conspiracy in Administrative Graft Cases
Explaining when public officials face administrative liability for errors, and when conspiracy or bad faith must be proven.
Judicial Conduct: Errors of Judgment vs Misconduct in Philippine Courts
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when a judge's error is mere error of judgment versus administrative misconduct requiring bad faith.
When Can a Judge Be Disciplined for an Erroneous Ruling? Lessons from De Guzman v. Pamintuan
The Supreme Court clarifies that judges are not automatically disciplined for every erroneous ruling—only for errors tainted by bad faith, fraud, malice, or dishonesty.
Judicial Accountability and the Good Faith Defense Against Unjust Judgment Charges
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that judges cannot be held administratively liable for erroneous rulings made in good faith, absent malice or bad faith.
Misrepresentation and Estafa: When Silence Isn't Golden in Property Sales
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on estafa under Article 316(2) RPC, the need for express misrepresentation, and civil liability for bad faith sales.
Breach of Contract: GSIS Liable for Failure to Return Title Despite Absence of Bad Faith
Philippine Supreme Court holds GSIS liable for breach of contract for failing to return a property title, even without bad faith. Learn the legal rules.
Good Faith Reliance on Subordinates Can Defeat Anti-Graft Charges Against Public Officials
Supreme Court rules a public official who relies in good faith on subordinates' certifications cannot be prosecuted for graft absent evident bad faith.