Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 193216 of 749 articles for taking

Reasonable Doubt in Qualified Theft: When Missing Proof Means Acquittal

A look at how the Supreme Court acquitted an accounting-in-charge of qualified theft when the prosecution failed to prove taking and intent.

Chain of Custody in Firearm Cases: When Delayed Marking Leads to Acquittal

The Supreme Court acquits a firearm possession accused over unjustified delayed marking, clarifying chain of custody rules under RA 10591.

Quitclaims and Illegal Dismissal: Understanding Employee Rights and Waivers in the Philippines

When is a quitclaim valid? The Supreme Court explains the rules on waivers and illegal dismissal in Vergara v. CDM Security Agency.

Unlawful Restraint Establishing Intent in Kidnapping and Serious Illegal Detention

The Supreme Court explains how acts of clubbing, sacking, and carrying a victim establish the intent to deprive liberty under Article 267.

Chain of Custody Safeguarding Drug Evidence and Protecting Individual Rights

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to follow Section 21's witness and inventory rules, protecting the accused's rights.

Sheriffs Duty to Serve Notice Before Implementing Writs: Consequences of Neglect

A sheriff who enforces a writ without prior notice violates due process. Learn the rules and penalties under Rule 39.

Distinguishing Robbery From Theft The Necessity of Violence or Intimidation in Taking Personal Property

The Supreme Court clarifies when a snatching is theft, not robbery, and what the prosecution must prove.

Calendar Days vs. Working Days: How Suspensions Are Counted for Philippine Government Employees

The Supreme Court clarifies that suspensions for government employees are served in calendar days, including weekends and holidays, not working days.

The High Cost of Homicide: Establishing Liability in Robbery With Homicide Cases

A look at how Philippine courts convict in robbery with homicide, from proving intent to the price of damages.

Tax Declarations as Evidence of Ownership: Protecting Possessory Rights

The Supreme Court clarifies that tax declarations, while not conclusive, are strong evidence of possession in the concept of owner when coupled with continuous possession.

Breach of Trust: How Philippine Law Punishes Theft by Domestic Servants

The Supreme Court explains qualified theft by domestic servants, intent to gain, and penalties under RA 10951.

AWOL and Dropping from the Rolls: Employee Rights Under Philippine Law

Learn the rules on AWOL in the Philippine civil service, including the 30-day rule, non-disciplinary separation, and employee rights.

Burden of Proof in Quasi-Delict Claims: Proving Negligence in Vehicular Accidents

Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling on negligence, quasi-delict liability, and evidentiary standards in a vehicular accident insurance subrogation case.

Testimony After Trauma: Res Gestae and Proving Guilt in Rape Cases

When a rape victim dies before trial, can her words still convict? The Supreme Court explains the res gestae exception to hearsay.

Free Patent Land and Road Projects: When the Government Must Pay Just Compensation

The Supreme Court clarifies when the government must pay just compensation for right-of-way easements over free patent lands under the Public Land Act.

Good Faith Belief in Ownership Defeats Qualified Theft Charge

Supreme Court acquits spouses of qualified theft, ruling that honest belief in ownership negates intent to steal.

Loss of Trust and Confidence as Just Cause: Balancing Employer Rights and Due Process in Termination Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies when loss of trust and confidence justifies dismissal, and when employers still owe employees procedural due process.

Reassessing Criminal Liability From Murder to Homicide Based on Evidence of Intent and Treachery

The Supreme Court clarifies when a killing is murder or homicide, requiring proof of treachery and intent beyond reasonable doubt.

When a Bus Driver's Sabbatical Becomes a Retirement Claim: The Macuray Case

The Supreme Court clarifies when a driver's break from work is abandonment, sabbatical, or retirement—and what benefits are due.

Judicial Ethics: Scrutinizing Complaints Against Justices and the Standard of Proof

A look at how the Supreme Court handles administrative complaints against justices, using a 2018 case to explain the burden of proof.

Project Employment in Construction: Defining Scope and Tenure in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies when construction workers are project employees, not regular employees, and what benefits they retain.

Road Right-of-Way Measurement: The 20-Meter Rule from the Highway Centerline

The Supreme Court clarifies that the 20-meter road right-of-way easement under the Public Land Act is measured from the centerline of the highway.

Fair Compensation for Agricultural Land Under CARP: Apo Fruits v. LBP

The Supreme Court clarifies how courts determine just compensation for agricultural land taken under CARP, and when interest starts to run.

Accountability Prevails: Principals Liable for Homicide During Robbery Regardless of Direct Participation

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that all participants in a robbery are liable for robbery with homicide even if they did not personally kill.