Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 124 of 70 articles for regular employees

Navigating Employment Status: Contract of Service vs Regular Employment in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies when workers in government-owned corporations are contract of service workers, not regular employees entitled to security of tenure.

Independent Contractor vs Employee: Proving Employment Status in Illegal Dismissal Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies how courts distinguish independent contractors from regular employees in illegal dismissal disputes, emphasizing the burden of proof on claimants.

Unmasking Labor Only Contracting Regular Employment Rights Prevail

Supreme Court clarifies labor-only contracting rules, affirming that workers performing core tasks for a principal are regular employees entitled to full protection.

Challenging Labor Only Contracting: Regular Employment Rights Affirmed

Supreme Court affirms that DOLE registration alone does not prove legitimate job contracting; workers performing principal business tasks are regular employees.

Regularization Standards Failure To Inform Converts Probationary Employee To Regular Status

Failure to inform probationary employees of regularization standards converts them to regular employees by operation of law, with full backwages.

Labor-Only Contracting: When a Contractor Becomes a Mere Agent of the Employer

The Supreme Court clarifies labor-only contracting rules in Ortiz v. Forever Richsons, protecting regular employees from illegal dismissal.

Employee vs Independent Contractor: Landmark Ruling on Regular Employment

Supreme Court clarifies when fixed-term contracts are invalid and workers become regular employees entitled to security of tenure.

Understanding Regular vs Fixed-Term Employment: Insights From a Landmark Supreme Court Ruling

A landmark ruling clarifies when fixed-term contracts are valid and when workers become regular employees entitled to security of tenure.

Understanding Regular Employment: How the Nature of Work Determines Employee Status in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies when construction workers become regular employees entitled to security of tenure, not merely project-based hires.

Regular vs Project Employment: What the Supreme Court Requires of Employers

A 2019 Supreme Court ruling clarifies when construction workers are regular employees, not project employees, and what employers must prove.

Regular Seasonal vs Regular Employment: What the Supreme Court Says About Worker Rights

The Supreme Court clarifies when "regular seasonal" workers become regular employees, protecting their rights under Philippine labor law.

Piece-Rate Workers Are Regular Employees Entitled to Security of Tenure

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that piece-rate payment does not negate regular employment, and abandonment requires proof of intent.

Regular Employment and Labor-Only Contracting: Lingat v. Coca-Cola Bottlers

Supreme Court clarifies when agency-hired workers are regular employees of the principal employer, and the limits of labor contracting.

Regular Employee Status: Distinguishing Independent Contractors From Labor-Only Contracting

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when workers are regular employees despite agency transfers, distinguishing independent contractors from labor-only contracting.

Regular Employment in Poultry Farms: Length of Service and Necessity of Work

Supreme Court clarifies when maintenance workers in poultry farms become regular employees under Philippine labor law.

Project Employment in Construction: Defining Scope and Tenure in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies when construction workers are project employees, not regular employees, and what benefits they retain.

Project Employment vs Regular Employment: Security of Tenure in Construction

The Supreme Court clarifies when construction workers are project employees, not regular employees, and their rights to wages and benefits.

Regular Employment vs Independent Contractor: The Control Test in Philippine Labor Disputes

The Supreme Court clarifies when construction workers are regular employees, not independent contractors, using the four-fold test and control test.

UST v. Samahang Manggagawa ng UST: When Repeated Hires Make Workers Regular Employees

The Supreme Court clarifies when repeated fixed-term hires for maintenance work create regular employment, not project employment, under the Labor Code.

Project Employees Remain Non-Regular Despite Repeated Rehiring: Herma Shipyard Case

Supreme Court clarifies that project employees performing necessary tasks and repeatedly rehired do not automatically become regular employees.

Project vs Regular Employment: Defining Boundaries of Fixed-Term Contracts in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies when project-based employees become regular employees and the validity of fixed-term contracts in Philippine labor law.

Project Employees vs Regular Employees: When Contracts Determine Labor Status

Supreme Court clarifies when project-based employees remain project employees despite repeated rehiring and performing tasks necessary to business.

Project Employment vs Regular Employment: What Philippine Law Says

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when construction workers are project employees and not regular employees, and what this means for termination rights.

Project vs Regular Employment: Defining Worker Rights in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies when construction workers are regular employees, not project-based, and the employer's burden of proof.