Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Evidentiary Burden in Robbery and Homicide Cases: Supreme Court Clarifies Proof Requirements
The Supreme Court clarifies what evidence proves robbery, rape, and aggravating circumstances in this 1999 ruling.
Unseen Crimes, Unshakable Justice: How Circumstantial Evidence Convicts in Rape-Homicide Cases
The Supreme Court explains how circumstantial evidence can prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in rape-homicide cases, as shown in People v. Dizon.
Proving Psychological Incapacity for Marriage Annulment in the Philippines: The Hernandez Case
Learn how the Supreme Court in Hernandez v. Hernandez clarified what evidence is needed to prove psychological incapacity for marriage annulment.
Demurrer to Evidence Denial Not Grave Abuse: Resoso v. Sandiganbayan
When can a denied demurrer to evidence be corrected by certiorari? Resoso v. Sandiganbayan explains the limits.
Caught Red Handed: Understanding Warrantless Arrests in Philippine Drug Cases
A look at People v. Requiz on buy-bust operations, warrantless arrests, and how courts assess drug evidence in the Philippines.
Rank-and-File vs Managerial Employees: Key Evidence for Union Certification in the Philippines
Learn what evidence proves managerial or supervisory status in Philippine union certification elections, based on the A.D. Gothong case.
Proving Guilt Beyond Doubt: How Circumstantial Evidence Works in Philippine Robbery with Homicide Cases
Philippine Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence suffices to convict for robbery with homicide, and why alibi fails.
Decoding Deeds Philippine Supreme Court Clarifies Contract Interpretation IN Property Sales
How the Supreme Court applied the parol evidence rule and literal interpretation in a disputed property sale with mortgage assumption.
Arraignment Admissions When Open Court Statements Cant BE Used Against YOU IN Philippine Courts
Philippine Supreme Court explains when a witness's open court statements may be disregarded and why physical evidence prevails over testimony.
When Silence Condemns: The Decisive Role of Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Robbery Homicide Cases
How the Supreme Court upheld a robbery-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence, not direct testimony, in People v. Raganas.
Alibi and Denial in Philippine Criminal Cases: Lessons from People v. Raganas
Why alibi and denial rarely convince Philippine courts, explained through People v. Raganas, a robbery with homicide case built on circumstantial evidence.
Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Criminal Law: When Is It Enough for Conviction
When can Philippine courts convict based on circumstantial evidence? Learn the rules and limits from People v. Apelado.
How Circumstantial Evidence Can Convict: Lessons from People v. Ortiz
Philippine courts can convict on circumstantial evidence alone if it forms an unbroken chain proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Unseen Crimes Unquestionable Guilt: How Circumstantial Evidence Convicts in Philippine Parricide Cases
A look at People v. Suelto, where the Supreme Court upheld a parricide conviction based on circumstantial evidence, not eyewitness testimony.
Proving Murder Without a Body: Conspiracy and Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court affirms murder convictions despite no body found, explaining how conspiracy and circumstantial evidence can prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Acquittal Due to Insufficient Evidence: Understanding Conspiracy in Philippine Fraud Cases
Learn how Philippine courts determine conspiracy in criminal cases, using the Marcelino murder case as a guide to evidentiary standards.
Beyond Eyewitnesses: How Philippine Courts Use Circumstantial Evidence to Secure Convictions
Philippine courts can convict based on circumstantial evidence when it forms an unbroken chain. Learn how in People v. De los Santos.
Kidnapping and Serious Illegal Detention: Proving Deprivation of Liberty Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on what evidence proves kidnapping and serious illegal detention, including the essential element of deprivation of liberty.
Victim Testimony in Rape Cases: Why Philippine Courts Prioritize Credibility
Philippine courts rely on credible victim testimony in rape cases. Learn how the Supreme Court weighed evidence in People v. Pagpaguitan.
Child Abuse Convictions Upheld: Parricide and Homicide in the Cariquez Case
The Supreme Court affirms parricide and homicide convictions of a mother and her partner for the fatal abuse of a 2-year-old child, clarifying key rules on circumstantial evidence and penalties.
Robbery with Homicide: When Circumstantial Evidence and Voluntary Confessions Convict
The Supreme Court affirms a robbery-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence and voluntary admissions to a confidant, not custodial interrogation.
Circumstantial Evidence and Confessions to Confidants: Robbery with Homicide Conviction
The Supreme Court affirms a robbery-with-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence and voluntary admissions to a trusted police officer.
Positive Identification in Philippine Kidnapping Cases: Why Witness Testimony Matters
Philippine courts rely on positive identification and circumstantial evidence to convict in serious crimes. Learn how witness testimony shapes outcomes.
Unlocking Ejectment Cases: How to Use New Evidence to Challenge a Final Judgment in the Philippines
Learn when Philippine courts allow newly discovered evidence to overturn a final ejectment judgment, and the proper legal remedies available.